UPDATE 28 June 2007: Google appear to have fixed this. Which is rubbish.
So, if a New Yorker wishes to visit me in sunny Coventry, England, he may well ask Google Maps the best way to get here. Take a note of item 23…
Are Google Maps inferring that my cross-Atlantic cousin needs more exercise?
Uploading images to this blogger.com blog is a fairly painless process but if you deleted the link to an uploaded image, that image was lost forever and you have to upload another copy.
However, all images uploaded to your blogger.com blog since December now automatically appear in a Picasa Web Album (which automatically exists under your Google user name) and can be freely accessed. This is a great new feature and one of those highly agreeable times when you are provided with a service or feature that was unexpected or surpasses your expectations.
It seems that the people at Google may have been listening to that wide world of the web as I am pleased to notice that their image results now have the dimensions and other information displayed at all times. So now we have the dynamic layout and the information we need. Congratulations, Google.
I’m sure it was my post that sorted this problem out. No need to thank me.
P.S. The unnecessary two-click image size select combo box is still there though.
Google Image Search has, for me, the most useful results of all the image search engines.
Some time ago it made it’s functionality slightly worse with a combo box to select which size of image you wanted. This required two clicks (one to open the box, one to select) to select your size as opposed to the previous one click to select a link which was always displayed.
Recently, the functionality of the page was essentially removed altogether when all metadata was hidden from view. Now, instead of using your eyes to scan the page looking for the picture of the size you want, you have to use your mouse. The information regarding the picture dimensions are only displayed when the mouse is hovered over the picture.
The reasons for this change are fairly clear. Along with the mouse-over behaviour, the image results are formatted more cleverly allowing for more result per page on, for example, widescreen or large browser windows. Also, the results page looks very clean. This is because there is no information on it.
Google offers no preferences to adjust this behaviour.
For me, I prefer to use my eyes to scan a page, not a mouse.